Oops !

President Obama certainly seemed to be a believer in the “everybody should be able to go to college“ school of thought. At a Democratic National Committee event, June 23, 2011 he said, “We still have so much more work to do on education. We have made great strides, but we have to hit the goal that I set that once again we will have the highest proportion of college graduates of any country in the world.” He remarked at the Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables, Fla., Feb. 23, 2012. “When kids graduate, I want them to be able to afford to go to college. If they’ve been working hard, if they’ve gotten the grades to go to college, I don’t want them to cut their dreams short because they don’t think they can afford it.” At the Weekly Address by President Obama on 8/16/14, he said, “And so as President, I’m working to make sure young people like Elizabeth can go to college without racking up mountains of debt. We reformed a student loan system so that more money goes to students instead of big banks.” 
To set the record straight ahead of time:

-I do not believe that everybody should go to college.

-When considering college it behooves every applicant to understand how he/she is  going to pay for that college education.

-If the cost of a college education is beyond one’s means, go to a community college first and get a part time job while going to school.

-Consider joining the military first so that it can aid you with your college expenses.

-Do not, and I repeat . . . do not go into significant debt in order to pursue your college    dream, and do not expect your parents to borrow money to pay for your college.


So keeping my thoughts in mind, I would have to say to President Obama, “Oops!”    For perhaps, as a consequence of his enthusiasm for his “everyone should be able to go to college,” many, many of today’s college graduates are in deep financial holes from which they may never dig out. 
There was a disturbing article last month in the Wall Street Journal on the sad situation about student loan payback at historically black colleges and universities (HBCU). The fact that this article was about HBCU is particularly relevant, because of the enormous influence President Obama had and still has with black youth. Granted white youths also have significant debt because of student loans, but as this article pointed out that attendees at these HBUC schools “have been hit particularly hard by the student-debt crisis,” as on average those from HBCU schools are further in debt. HBCU alumni have a median federal-debt load of about $29,000 at graduation – 32% above graduates at other public and non-profit four year schools. Even worse “the majority of HBCU grads haven’t paid even $1 of their original loan balance in the first few years out of school.” One wonders if these non loan-balance payers understand the basic concept of principle and interest. Oops!

Now granted the indebted students that have graduated from an HBCU school are really no different than indebted students that have graduated from non-HBCU schools, except that “many HBCU schools see a mandate in giving opportunity to disadvantaged youth, who often start out with fewer financial resources and a diminished ability to pay.” The WSJ article tells the stories of various individual HBCU graduates as well as stories of HBCU graduate’s families who are in dire straits because of these student loans. At this point I have to wonder if that HBCU college education debt is going to be worth it. Have those with a diminished ability pay been done a service or a disservice? Will this federal-debt be a millstone around their necks for many years, decades, or even forever? When will they be able to start a family? Will they ever be able to buy a house? I have empathy for these individuals, but perhaps the decision to go to college was misguided in the first place. One wonders if those who acted as their cheerleaders understand the concept of principle and interest! Oops!

Small, but Mighty

On May 30 my local newspaper had a large picture of a small infant accompanying a front page headline that said, “SMALL BUT MIGHTY, BABY BEATS ODDS; Premie born at 8.6 ounces is the tiniest infant ever to survive.” The infant was delivered by C-section at 23 weeks gestation in December, 2018 because of the mother’s life threatening preeclampsia. The story goes on to detail the various reasons why premies this small usually do not survive, but this premie girl beat the odds and has gone home. To me this story on the front page is somewhat oxymoronic for this ultra liberal local newspaper that usually leans far to the left on just about anything. Could this represent a small, but potentially mighty change in the attitude of this liberal “paper.” Highlighting that a 8.6 oz. 23 week gestation premie is alive, well, and now home is a bit odd in the context of the recent continued leftward-shift on abortion being promulgated by various state legislatures.

As pointed out by Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the national pro-life group Susan B. Anthony List:“Take for example the sweeping abortion billDemocrats in the Illinois legislature are trying to ram through in the last days of their session. This bill would create a “fundamental right” to abortion, wiping out all sorts of modest limits Illinois has on the books and effectively expanding abortion on demand (already paid for by taxpayers) through the moment of birth and even infanticide. It repeals the state’s ban on grisly partial-birth abortions; since the federal ban still applies, it seems this was intended to make a statement about values. It also allows non-doctors to perform abortions, removes conscience protections for pro-life health care workers, and would force all private health insurance plans to cover abortion – including religious organizations. This bill is even more radical than the law signed by New York’s Governor Cuomo and the failed bill proposed by a Virginia legislator earlier this year.”

According to the latest polling (May 17-20,2019) 45% of Independents believe that abortion should be generally available to those who want it, while 36% think that abortion should be available but under stricter limits than it is now, and 17 % feel that abortion should not be permitted. These Independent stats have not changed much over the last 15 years, but now the more radical abortion laws these different state legislatures pass (e.g. Illinois), the more the Independents will back away. With more radical things like partial birth abortion, and infanticide, it’s easy to predict a shifting of the of Independents’ thinking more toward abortion with stricter limits than it is now. A small, but potentially mighty change. For those of us who are against abortion this shift can only be good.