According to the San Jose Mercury News, apparently enough signatures have been collected to put an initiative on the ballot that would split the present state of California into three separate states. The new state of “California” would include Los Angeles and would basically extend up along the Pacific Ocean to Monterrey. The new proposed state of “Southern California” would include Orange County, San Diego and the counties in the mid and the eastern part of the state up to just past Fresno. The new proposed state of “Northern California” would include San Francisco, Sacramento, and all the way to the Nevada and the Oregon state lines. Of course the people of California can express their opinion through this ballot measure, but the ultimate determination would be made by the U.S. Congress.
Two questions:
First of all which way would those of you who live in California vote?
And secondly . . . Let’s assume that this proposed ballot measure passes in California, which way do you think the vote would go in the U.S. Congress?
To be clear, this splitting of a state to make two separate states has been done in the past, so this splitting up of California is not without precedence.
To analyze the political effects of this proposed division, let’s look at the effect on both the U.S House and the U.S. Senate. There would be little if any effect in the U.S. House of Representatives because the representation in the House is determined by a state’s population, and since the population of California would be the same both before and after the proposed division.
However, the big change would be in the U.S. Senate, because each state gets two senators. So the “new California” would now be three separate states, and so would be represented by six U.S.Senators – two from each of the new states. So if two of the three new states were to vote for Democrats, the balance in the Senate would in essence remain the same as it is now with +2 senators (present California Senators) for the Democrats. The Republicans could benefit would be if two of the three proposed new states were to vote in two Republicans each, or if the voters would elect three Democrats and three Republicans combined in the three new states. Neither of these scenarios is likely to happen in the near future, if ever, so I would assume that the Republicans in Congress would be against this CAL 3 proposal. However, keep in mind that the House now is Republican, but could easily be flipped in November. Would the Democrats think that this is a way to strengthen their Democratic representation in the Senate?
To even things out, perhaps Texas should split into “East Texas” and “West Texas?”
But until that happens, I will be voting “No” on CAL 3.
lipitor 10mg without prescription atorvastatin 20mg oral buy atorvastatin 80mg pill
purchase ciprofloxacin – buy keflex no prescription amoxiclav online
ciprofloxacin brand – buy baycip paypal augmentin 625mg drug
flagyl 200mg drug – order oxytetracycline generic buy azithromycin 250mg without prescription
order ciprofloxacin online – amoxicillin 500mg over the counter
order erythromycin without prescription
valacyclovir price – order diltiazem 180mg sale zovirax pills
ivermectin 3 mg online – buy sumycin pills order generic sumycin 250mg
order metronidazole 400mg pills – cost cleocin 300mg buy zithromax
purchase ampicillin sale buy generic penicillin cheap amoxil tablets
buy furosemide pill diuretic – captopril cost order captopril online
purchase glycomet sale – order glucophage 1000mg pill lincomycin 500mg usa
where to buy zidovudine without a prescription – rulide 150 mg for sale buy zyloprim 300mg online
order generic clozapine – glimepiride usa buy pepcid 20mg pill
seroquel 50mg drug – bupron SR for sale cheap eskalith sale
clomipramine 50mg sale – buy asendin generic purchase doxepin online cheap
buy generic hydroxyzine 25mg – buy amitriptyline 25mg for sale endep 10mg uk
order amoxil online cheap – buy erythromycin paypal purchase baycip generic
buy augmentin 625mg generic – order myambutol 600mg generic buy cipro 1000mg online cheap
cleocin online buy – generic terramycin 250mg buy chloromycetin without a prescription
order azithromycin 500mg pills – buy sumycin 250mg pill ciplox over the counter
buy ventolin 4mg sale – order theo-24 Cr generic theophylline 400 mg sale
ivermectin 3mg over the counter – ivermectin order online cheap cefaclor 250mg
cost clarinex 5mg – buy generic clarinex for sale order albuterol inhalator
cheap medrol – buy montelukast tablets buy azelastine 10ml nasal spray
generic micronase 2.5mg – micronase 2.5mg over the counter order generic forxiga
order repaglinide 2mg generic – buy jardiance 10mg pills buy empagliflozin 10mg generic
buy glycomet 1000mg pill – buy sitagliptin 100mg without prescription buy cheap generic acarbose
buy lamisil 250mg for sale – purchase fulvicin online order griseofulvin
rybelsus 14 mg pill – DDAVP cheap order desmopressin for sale
order nizoral 200 mg sale – buy butenafine generic sporanox sale
famciclovir 250mg uk – buy famciclovir without prescription buy valcivir pills for sale
digoxin 250 mg usa – buy digoxin online furosemide 100mg cheap
order hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg generic – purchase felodipine sale zebeta pill
lopressor over the counter – telmisartan order buy nifedipine 10mg for sale
nitroglycerin for sale – lozol buy online buy valsartan 160mg without prescription
rosuvastatin union – pravachol natural caduet pills result
simvastatin respectable – tricor communication atorvastatin empty
viagra professional online table – super kamagra fantastic levitra oral jelly online torture
priligy time – sildigra else cialis with dapoxetine mill
cenforce online twin – cialis pill brand viagra online stool
brand cialis bronze – alprostadil superior penisole weakness
cialis soft tabs online grateful – cialis super active online strange1 viagra oral jelly online melt
brand cialis vivid – penisole teach penisole warrior
cialis soft tabs jane – viagra super active online gaz viagra oral jelly model
cenforce online london – tadalis patience brand viagra explosion