When we elect a U.S. Senator or a U.S. member of the House, he/she is supposed to represent us in Washington D.C. Now we may or may not agree with that elected person all of the time, but he/she is our voice when it comes to national matters. These elected representatives are paid a salary that comes from the taxes that we pay. In essence they work for us. We, the citizens of their state or district, are the employers and they are the employees.
Likewise when we elect a member of the California legislature, he/she is our representative in Sacramento when it comes to state issues. They are paid to deal with matters concerning California, and they are paid essentially by us through the state taxes that we pay. Again the citizens of California are the employers, and they are our employees. If they were frivolously wasting their time while on the clock, we, the employers, would have a legitimate beef. “Why, when you are on company time and we are paying you, are you not doing things that are related to the state’s business?
Certainly in any private enterprise the employer has the right to demand that his employees spend their time working – working on company items and company business. Certainly, the employer would be justified in asking, “Why when I am paying your salary, are you doing things on company time that are not pertinent to my company?”
Likewise when we elect someone to the City Council, they are our representatives in a matters related to the city. We, the citizens of the city, are in essence paying their salaries through the taxes that we pay. We are the employers and they are our employees. Should we not expect them, while on company time, to spend their time and energy dealing with city issues and city business?
On 10/17/17 in a closed door session the San Diego City Council voted to support an amicus brief in a case concerning a Colorado baker. This case is scheduled to be heard on December 5th before the U.S. Supreme Court. Apparently this amicus brief proposal was brought to the City Council for a vote at the bequest of Mara Elliott, a San Diego City Attorney.
There are so many things wrong here that I am not sure where to start!
First of all . . . “Closed door session”! Why in God’s name would this vote be held in a closed door session? From my perspective, there are only two reasonable explanations for discussing anything in a closed door session. One obvious good reason is that there is sensitive and private information that is being discussed. To me the other obvious reason is to hope that the public does not hear about it. If one was trying to cover up some frivolous behavior, a closed session would be perfect.
Second . . . why is the San Diego City Council wasting company time discussing and then voting to support or not support some case involving Colorado? Even if the case was centered in another part of California, this would not be a matter for the San Diego City Council. Again, forgive me, but shouldn’t our employees (the City Council) be spending their time dealing with our city’s issues? “Why are you not doing things, while on company time, that are related to the city of San Diego, when the citizens of San Diego are paying your salary?”
Third . . . Is the San Diego City Attorney also an employee of city of San Diego? If so, then it appears that Ms. Elliott also works for us (the tax-payers of the city). When she is on company time, we, the tax-payers, are paying her salary. To her I ask, “Why are you not doing things that are related to the city’s affairs, when we are paying you?” To make this even more egregious this is not the first time that Ms. Elliott has “brought forth a proposal for San Diego to get involved in controversial cases elsewhere in the country” . . . while on company time.
Fourth . . . What makes this even more ludicrous is that this case is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court in about six weeks. Does Ms. Elliott and the San Diego City Council really think that the judges on the Supreme Court are really going to let an amicus brief from the San Diego City Council influence their decision? Or is this merely a political stunt; a political stunt being done when they are supposed to be on the clock – working for the city?
Now, as one of the ‘San Diego tax-payer employers’ I say, “If the City Council and Ms. Elliott want to discuss matters and vote on things that do not relate to this city, please do it on your own time – not on company time!”
buy lipitor 80mg generic buy atorvastatin 10mg without prescription order atorvastatin 40mg generic
cipro 1000mg oral – order myambutol for sale amoxiclav cheap
order baycip sale – augmentin 375mg uk order amoxiclav generic
purchase flagyl for sale – order cleocin generic azithromycin 500mg pill
buy ciplox generic – buy doryx generic erythromycin 500mg canada
buy valacyclovir generic – oral mebendazole 100mg zovirax 800mg ca
can you buy stromectol over the counter – where can i buy cefixime order sumycin 250mg without prescription
oral metronidazole 400mg – purchase terramycin generic azithromycin 250mg for sale
order ampicillin pill penicillin sale amoxicillin us
buy lasix generic diuretic – buy generic coumadin online capoten online buy
glucophage brand – buy baycip pill lincocin 500mg oral
purchase retrovir generic – irbesartan 150mg drug where can i buy allopurinol
buy clozaril 50mg online – amaryl 1mg cheap buy famotidine 20mg online cheap
seroquel online buy – buy luvox 100mg pill cheap eskalith pills
anafranil 25mg price – brand duloxetine 20mg sinequan 25mg ca
atarax 25mg canada – lexapro for sale endep 10mg drug
amoxil drug – how to buy ceftin buy cipro medication
augmentin 625mg usa – purchase ciprofloxacin generic buy cheap cipro
generic cleocin – buy oxytetracycline without a prescription buy cheap chloramphenicol
purchase zithromax online cheap – buy azithromycin tablets buy cheap generic ciprofloxacin
buy ivermectin 12 mg – order cefaclor 250mg cefaclor capsules
buy ventolin online cheap – order seroflo online order theo-24 Cr 400 mg generic
clarinex sale – order albuterol generic buy albuterol inhalator generic
medrol generic – how to buy fluorometholone purchase azelastine
purchase micronase generic – actos 30mg tablet forxiga for sale
order generic prandin 2mg – prandin 1mg cheap empagliflozin ca
purchase glycomet – order glucophage without prescription how to get precose without a prescription
purchase terbinafine pill – griseofulvin sale griseofulvin uk
order rybelsus generic – cost DDAVP buy generic desmopressin
order nizoral 200mg online cheap – buy sporanox 100 mg generic buy sporanox 100mg generic
buy famvir without a prescription – zovirax without prescription valaciclovir oral
order lanoxin generic – buy generic calan 240mg buy furosemide 100mg pill
microzide ca – zestril 2.5mg drug order zebeta pills
metoprolol over the counter – olmesartan sale nifedipine 30mg drug
order nitroglycerin without prescription – purchase combipres purchase diovan
crestor pills request – caduet buy lump caduet buy instant
simvastatin dusk – tricor cavern lipitor older
buy viagra professional code – viagra professional swoop levitra oral jelly involve
dapoxetine afterward – levitra with dapoxetine upon cialis with dapoxetine pippin
cenforce advice – brand viagra pills wand brand viagra online national
brand cialis favour – forzest haul penisole smash
cialis soft tabs online brief – caverta online loss viagra oral jelly little
brand cialis attend – penisole into penisole sound
cialis soft tabs pills whether – valif online dismiss viagra oral jelly online heavy
cenforce online crown – tadacip examine brand viagra pills lion